Abstract—Underdeveloped countries like Turkey, must play their trump card; use every issue as a matter of negotiation in order to benefit from the globalization process. In this touch-and-go process, the main aim of difficult geographies whose social ties are on thin ice like Turkey is “gain time” rather than “make use of time” AKP is likely to make a profound profit and loss account following the elections because AKP did not acquired many things rather than diluting the influence of army on politics, increasing vote levels in East via identity politics, forming a bourgeoisie for itself. AKP became the first party in elections but injured. The party conducts international relations with the USA and EU unilaterally. These relations can be summarized as follows: “Solve Cyprus problem,not consider Nagorno Karabagh/Prevent army but we have a similar stance on headscarf problem with Kemalist secular segment/ Emancipate minorities, not demand about the rights of Turkish minorities in EU/Support countries which we support but not anticipate our support for the international organizations and actors which you support.”
Index Terms—USA, Turkey, AKP, Kemalism, globalization,nation-state
Cite: A. Baran DURAL, " New World Order- AKP-Turkey: Global Dilemma in a Nation-state," International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 158-163, 2010.